Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Greenhouse Gas Theory Discredited by 'Coolant' Carbon Dioxide
johnosullivan

Science professor, a former global warming believer now denier, publishes groundbreaking paper to prove carbon dioxide cools, not warms, our atmosphere.

Professor Nasif Nahle found something deeply troubling about the man-made global warming theory (AGW). He explains, “I started out wanting to debunk those deniers of science.”
Nahle had originally believed that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) were warming the atmosphere until he found an incorrect assumption within the greenhouse effect hypothesis.

Invited to attend a televised debate on the Indonesian Tsunami that addressed whether global warming was a factor in that catastrophe, Nahle checked the validity of calculations relating to the combined reactions of certain atmospheric gases to solar radiation in the so-called greenhouse effect. “That was when I saw it was junk science.”

Global Warming Scare is “Anti-science”

 

In an astonishing personal U-turn Nahle has taken on the task of demonstrating that the demonization of CO2 was premised on a faulty hypothesis. Nahle completed his controversial study with the assistance of American physicist, Dr. Charles Anderson. Anderson is one of eight coauthors of the controversial book, ‘Slaying the Sky Dragon’ that also falsifies the ‘greenhouse gas’ effect. Nasif says, “Dr. Anderson and I found that the coolant effect of the carbon dioxide is stronger when oxygen is included into the mixture.”


Nasif says, “To my surprise, I found that the hypothesis was flawed and that the AGW proponents were inventing variables and constants. As I starting to apply the correct data and algorithms, I was realizing that the whole hypothesis was wrong from the physics standpoint."

The 60-year-old’s career is now firmly focused on climate-related research; in 2010 he began working on Climate Change and Biodiversity at the Superior School of Biology, University Juarez of the State of Durango. Nahle is so converted in his thinking that he now calls the greenhouse gas theory, ”antiscience" and "pseudoscience.”

 

Read more here.



  • 1
(Suspicious comment)

Re: CO2 neither warms nor cools

Harry,
I agree that the peer review process is likely corrupt. It has recently come to light among us 'Slayers' of the GHE that there is an international 'grading system' among science journals that ranks publications in their adherence to an arbitrary code that is sinister and corruptive of an objective peer review process.
We have reasons to suspect that a lower ranked journal may be the subject of such pressure to not consider publishing papers submitted from researchers belonging to the Slayers group.
The consequences of scientific misconduct can be severe at a personal level for both perpetrators and any individual who exposes it.
Most reasonable scientists do not need me to tell them that this is not only unconscionable and unethical and contrary to the interests of science per se, but let’s be clear here, suppression—the failure to publish significant findings due to the results being adverse to the interests of the researcher or his/her sponsor(s) may constitute criminal fraud if such collusion protects those who have sought to benefit financially or otherwise from their misrepresentation.
That there appears to be a lack of will amongst some self-serving governments to properly investigate and deal with such misconduct now makes it incumbent upon the wider community of scientists to unite under a new umbrella organization willing to take action, in courts of law if necessary, to weed out those who tarnish the good name of all conscientious scientists. This will be a key rallying message of Principia Scientific International (PSI) when it is formed later in 2011.
With the groundswell of support for Dr. Tim Ball, in his principled stand against corruption in climate science (i.e. Dr. Michael 'Hockey Stick' Mann v. Dr. Tim Ball libel case) we feel sure PSI will succeed where politicians and navel-gazing national science academies have failed.

  • 1
?

Log in

No account? Create an account